网络编辑平台

编辑出版

《中国临床医学》编辑部

  地址:上海市枫林路179号18号楼501室

  邮编:200032

  电话:021-60267570

  邮箱:(1)zglcyx@126.com; (2)zglcyxfb@126.com

作者园地

在线调查

您喜欢的投稿方式调查


相关下载

您所在位置:首页->过刊浏览->第19卷第3期


论著:微创经皮和有限切开复位锁定加压钢板治疗胫骨骨折的疗效比较
Efficacy Comparison of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous and Limited Open Reduction Pressure Plate Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Tibial Fractures
王坤 刘德昌
点击:1211次 下载:0次
作者单位:复旦大学附属金山医院骨科
中文关键字:微创;锁定加压钢板;胫骨骨折
英文关键字:Minimally invasive; Locking compression plate; Tibial fractures
中文摘要:目的:比较微创经皮钢板内固定(minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis,MIPPO)与有限切开复位锁定加压钢板(locking compression plate,LCP)内固定治疗胫骨骨折的疗效。方法:回顾分析2006年2月—2010年9月接受MIPPO治疗的胫骨骨折患者42例(MIPPO组)以及接受有限切开复位LCP内固定治疗的胫骨骨折患者62例(有限切开组)的临床资料,比较其手术过程及治疗效果。结果:所有病例均获得随访,平均随访时间为12个月(6~20个月)。有限切开组的平均手术时间显著短于MIPPO组,而有限切开组的术后疗效与MIPPO组相比无显著差异。结论:MIPPO较有限切开复位LCP内固定治疗胫骨骨折手术难度大,但两者疗效无显著差异。
英文摘要:Objective: To compare the efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation using locking compression plate (LCP) and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO) in tibial fractures. Methods: The clinical data of 42 cases of tibial fractures undergoing MIPPO (MIPPO group) and 62 cases undergoing open reduction and internal fixation using locking compression plate (LCP group) were retrospectively studied. Results: The operation time was less in the LCP group than in the MIPPO group. All patients have been followed up for an average period of 12 months (from 6 to 20 months). There was no significant difference in the curative effect between the LCP group and the MIPPO group. Conclusions: MIPPO require more surgery skills than the traditional open reduction and internal fixation using locking compression plate. However, there are no significant difference between the efficacy of them in tibial fractures.
读者评论

      读者ID: 密码:   
我要评论:
主办单位:复旦大学附属中山医院
联系地址:上海市枫林路179号18号楼501室 邮编:200032
联系电话:021-60267570 E-Mail:(1)zglcyx@126.com; (2)zglcyxfb@126.com
版权所有©2009-2010 《中国临床医学》杂志编辑部 沪ICP备1103249号
本系统由北京菲斯特诺科技有限公司设计开发
您是本站第1269992名访问者